Tuesday,
12 November 2002 8:30 am
While
over the last two decades the computer industry was busily
evolving from vertically integrated companies to a network of
specialized players, the telecommunications industry was not.
Today, both the telecommunications carriers and their
equipment vendors are still heavily vertically integrated,
attempting to do as much as possible themselves.
On
the carrier side, management attention and shareholder’s capital
has been focused in recent years on increasing
vertical integration – AT&T attempting to integrate with
cable companies, baby bells attempting to integrate everything
from internet access to broadband services to long distance
services into their local voice networks, and long distance voice
carriers attempting to add local voice service, internet access,
internet backbones, and wireless services. This has resulted in a
set of very large companies offering increasingly undifferentiated services,
competing completely on price, and thus driving the whole industry
into simultaneous insolvency. In other words, competition at its
worst.
When
an over-capacity situation develops in a healthy competitive
market, the weakest players go out of business and reduce the
total capacity, allowing the stronger players to return to health.
In the telecommunications carrier market the failure of the
weakest players (e.g. WorldCom) will probably not reduce total
capacity at all. There
are two possible scenarios of what will happen with WorldCom. In
the first scenario, WorldCom emerges from bankruptcy without its
debt load. In this
scenario, it will instantly be more cost competitive than its
competition, who will have no choice but to seek bankruptcy
reorganization themselves in order to dump their debt loads.
In the second scenario, WorldCom ceases operations and
liquidates its assets. In
this scenario, the long distance capacity will be bought by others
(e.g. Warren Buffett via Level 3) for bargain prices, and put back
into business as cut-rate competition to the other carriers, who
will of course have to seek bankruptcy to compete.
So everybody goes bankrupt, regardless.
As I said, competition at its worst.
In
the telecommunications equipment business, things are not much
better. At the current stock and bond prices that investors have
assigned to them, it is already assumed that all of the big
traditional players (e.g. Lucent, Nortel, Alcatel, Ericsson) will
go bankrupt, more or less simultaneously.
So almost the entire telecommunications industry is
cleverly structured for self-annihilation, and is busily working
at carrying it out!
Vertical
integration has failed miserably on both the carrier and the
equipment vendor side. At
present course and speed, almost everyone dies, followed by
successor companies and a few survivors who will rise out of the
ashes as a network of specialists, each focusing on specific
aspects of the business. The survivors and successors will survive
and prosper by offering superior services and products in their
particular niches, as their counterparts in the the computer
industry do.
There
is no necessity, however, for the present course and speed to be mindlessly
maintained like some modern-day Titanic steaming for
an iceberg – most of the big players still have enough cash to
change course and move toward a more healthy industry structure.
Who knows, by changing course, they may actually be able to
attract new capital once again.