Friday,
08 November 2002 8:30 am
Why
does deflation have a bad reputation?
The reason is that rapid deflation would bankrupt all
debtors, causing an economic collapse. This
is one explanation of what caused the Great Depression, which is
why deflation is linked in most people's minds with a
depression. But there have been deflationary periods in the
US and elsewhere that were not accompanied by depressions.
Some have argued that the total public and private debt levels
were much lower in those situations, while they were at
historically high levels in the 1930's. Unfortunately, today
public and private debt is once again at levels similar to the
1930's, a worrisome fact.
My
interpretation of Wednesday's unexpectedly large rate cut by the
Federal Reserve is that the Fed now sees deflation as a
serious threat and is attempting to preempt it. The stock
market appeared to confirm that view by selling off on the
announcement.
How is it possible
to have deflation when the system is being flooded with
liquidity? Economist Frank Shostak
offered in an interview yesterday the best explanation I have
seen. Here are some excerpts from his interview (for the
full text, visit www.mises.org
- I added the chart):
“If
you read the Fed's statement, you see that creating money is the
goal. If you look at the money base, the latest figures for
October, increases were running 6.7 percent year on year. In
September, the increases were running 5 percent. So already, the
Fed was pushing quite a bit of new money into the system. It
won’t surprise me to see them really step it up now. ”
“While
the Fed is going to do its best to inflate the money, it can
happen that money supply won’t increase - depending on the
behavior of banks. If banks stop lending, due to tighter credit
standards or fewer borrowers, the money supply will not respond.
This is what happened in the 1930s.”
“Consumer
and real estate loans by commercial banks are still strong. But
business loans have been declining on a yearly basis for 15 months
in a row. Credit standards are tightening and many businesses have
difficulties to obtain credit. Also, the debt-to-asset ratio in
business is at the highest level as far back as we have data.”
“In
short, banks are happy to lend to consumers and on real estate and
mortgages. But in the business sector, the credit crunch is real.
The possibility that the US could end up like Japan is quite high.
Given the record high consumer debt-to-assets ratio I envisage
that banks will slow their lending to consumers in the months
ahead.”
“This
raises a question. If you have had such aggressive lowering of
interest rates for so long, from 6 percent to less than 2 percent,
and nothing has happened to industrial production, that
immediately raises the possibility that we are dealing with
something more serious than people realize.”
“The
analogy between the US and Japan is increasingly conspicuous. In both
cases, the central bank has lowered rates to virtually nil, and not
revived the economy. Most of the recent indicators in the US have been
declining. ”
“Prices
have not responded because businesses do not have pricing power.
The reason is that people don’t have as much real income as they
used to have. If you don’t have the means to spend, it is hard
for business to raise prices. ”
I
believe that mild deflation is the most likely scenario for the
next few years, rather than the depression-creating type. I am
persuaded in that view by economist Gary Shilling, who in
his 1999 book Deflation:
How to Survive and Thrive in the Coming Wave of Deflation predicted that after the collapse of the
stock market bubble we
would transition into a period of mild deflation. (Those of
us who read his book as well as Robert Shiller's 2000 companion
work Irrational
Exuberance and acted on their predictions are a much
happier lot today than those who did not.) The
transition to the mild deflationary period will likely be more
painful than the deflationary period to follow.